Quick Landscape Photos Enhancement Tutorial
Posted by Roland | Posted in Photography, Photoshop, Tutorials | Posted on 15-11-2009
Tags: blending, enhance, landscape, lightroom, Photography, Photoshop, raw, tutorial
9
Hy all
How are you doing? Is everything going well? Well, I suppose the answer is yes, yes and once more YES
This week wasn’t so rich with updates, but still, I didn’t forget about my blog
As you all may have already noticed, now there are 2 authors on this blog, me and a good friend of mine — Dmitri who will write more about photography
And he already created his first post about Essentials of Macro Photography
Well, I thought a bit and decided that I really have to write about how I enhance my photos after taking them
Yeah…I’ll open some secrets and show you a real face of how photos look like when they are not photo manipulated
The most important part is photo shooting. Even that Photoshop gives you a lot of possibilities and even crappy pictures may look good enough after some clever improvements, you still have to shoot well enough, otherwise there will be nothing to enhance
I don’t care what camera do you use of what settings do you use, try to get the best photo for post processing. We have two different options here:
- to shoot pictures in RAW mode with a tripod
- to shoot pictures in RAW mode without a tripod
As you’ve noticed, RAW is a must-used function if your camera allow you to shoot in it. Why is it so important? Well, in future reviews I’ll definitely write some article about RAW shooting vs. JPEG shooting. Now I would like to concentrate on post-processing. So, just believe me and use RAW instead of JPEG. And don’t claim, that RAW files are so big, and you have to process in your PC what takes a lot of time + then your PC has to be very powerful. Well, yeah…I agree with you
But if you want your pictures to be in high quality and good-looking, forget about all that small things
USE RAW !!!
Why do we need a tripod? This is also a good topic for another article. For this article we need it, cause we need 3 pictures with various exposure (-1, 0, +1). You’re totally right – we will use them to enhance Dynamic Range of our photos.
If you don’t have a tripod, that’s not a problem
If you are not trying to shoot at night or late evening or early morning, then shooting from hands is good enough. I made my shot from hands, cause I forgot my tripod at home. That day was a very moody weather. We went fishing but caught nothing. So, I took out my camera to catch some good weather moments
I made about 20 shots but a lot of them were crappy. So, I chose the best one and now we will start working on it. In my tutorial we will be using Adobe Lightroom, cause this is awesome software for a Photographers + Adobe Photoshop and I don’t want to start explaining why
Original File
As you see, the picture definitely needs some adjustment. It is so poor and gray. I don’t see emotions here
And for me Landscape should have emotions. Otherwise, it’s not a landscape — just a pop-art.

3 pictures with various exposure
So, now the photo is uploaded. We need 3 pictures with various exposures. In Lightroom after loading all pictures go to Develop zone, here we start working.
I always create a Virtual copy, so there always remains an original file. Right-click on a thumbnail in the bottom of the screen and take Create Virtual Copy — that’s in the middle of pop-up menu. Let’s call it – 0-exp file
Now to make the process a bit quicker we will take a preset (Left menu in Develop zone) — Direct Positive. This preset makes a very cool adjustments in seconds but that’s not enough.

After it is done we create 2 Virtual copes of adjusted picture and tweak their basic settings to make the:
- first photo darker and emphasize the sky – it will be “-1-exposure”
- second photo lighter and emphasize the ground and Forrest in the background – it will be “+1-exposure”
So now we have 3 pictures:
- 0-exposure with Direct Positive applied to it
- –1-exposure with adjusted basic settings to make picture darker
- +1-exposure with adjusted basic settings to make picture lighter
Export them as TIF files, or PSD or DNG but NOT JPEG.
Blending in Photoshop
Now open all 3 files in PS. Drag light and dark pictures on top of original, so all the 3 pictures would be in one file. And place the layers as it is shown on the picture below.

0-exposure layer should be at the bottom
–1-exposure after it and +1-exposure on top of all. We will start with our second layer that is darker than others. Click on the eye of the top layer to hide it, so we could work with the layers below it. We will use the second layer to enhance sky details. First of all, create a mask for this layer Layer — Layer Mask — Hide all.

Now take a regular brush, click on second layer mask and define a white color for the brush. Now begin painting with it over the sky, revealing the second layer and making sky darker. By playing with the mask I also emphasize dark colors on the ground to make them deeper. Now reveal the top layer and create the mask for it using Layer — Layer Mask — Hide all. And again, take white brush and paint over those spots, that you need to highlight
I generally use it over the all over the ground + on sky highlights to emphasize them more. Now look at the layers with masks I got. I made them bigger so it would be better to observe.

Compare before and after
And now we can compare the original photo and the one I got just by blending 3 pictures into one.
Nice effect, isn’t it?
So, as you see, it’s not so hard. I made this photo in less than 5 minutes. Ok, let’s spend another 5 minutes and play a bit with color, contrast adjustments and so on…
Adjustments
Using Curves we add a bit of contrast.

Adding Levels we make the picture a bit brighter.

Now the fun part begins
I would like to add more green color and emphasize yellow, because on our original picture there was no green and no yellow, there was one big mess of gray. It’s all because of light and because Camera matrix just can’t see all the colors
So, a bit of adjustments…

And now, to add more yellow I will use selective color. Actually, I began using it just some months ago and I blame myself that I didn’t use it before.

And one more compare before and after
Awesome effect, isn’t it?
I think it’s enough for today…next time I’ll write a bit about other tips and tricks I use to enhance my landscape shots.
By the way, you can download a psd file to look at it more deeply. Sorry for RapidShare. If you need, I can put it in different locations.
Take Care,
Roland
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.






WOW! cool tutorial ! nice enhancement, thank you for this great tutorial.
.-= WPSMASHВґs last blog ..40 Inspiring Webdesign Sites =-.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by rl_creative: New post: Quick Landscape Photos Enhancement Tutorial http://bit.ly/2jIPl0...
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I’m not so sure about this stuff. There is a guy local to where I live who does this sort of thing a lot and tries to sell it locally, but people don’t really like it. It doesn’t really look like the landscape people recognise, so while it is art, it’s not really representing anything other than the capabilities of the processing. People just look a bit bemused. If you ask me, this was a rather boring photo that was tarted up a bit to no great effect.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Well, this article isn’t pointed to give people some tips about photo shooting. This is pure processing. Yep, the colors are a bit unreal, cause they’re saturated. If you have a good monitor and it is calibrated, then of course it will be too much saturated, but on poor monitors and in print such shots look nice
Anyway, thanks a lot for your opinion, I’m going to write more tutorials about photography and very hope you’ll visit and write your opinion also on my future posts.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
My point is that the fruits of this kind of work are often less popular than the artist thinks they should be. Making a scene into a personal work of art takes it away from being recognisable by the audience. As a result most people just think it looks a bit weird, which isn’t good.
And I do think that the original pic in this case just isn’t that good, and not really worth all the effort.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I got your point and what you want to tell me. Again you trying to explain me, that bad photo is bad photo and no matter what photographer will do with — it’s a bad photo
Well, if you are a photographer and if read a bit about how films were processed, then you get to know, that Photoshop is a kindegarden in front of Film processing. And taking bad pictures makes you a bad photographer but not a bad artist. If you don’t have enough skills to photograph, you can post-process.
And again I emphasize, that this tutorial was made to teach people how to process photos (digital camera censor will never take 100% real colors, they always will be less saturated with wrong colors, with no contrast and so on).
One last thing: http://www.photographymadesimple.co.uk/ashton-court-bristol/ — is this a real picture here? That’s damn HDR, what is pure processing and don’t tell me that picture looks real
Maybe colors are ok, but the whole effect is awful.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Fair enough, it’s not one of our best, but I’m not trying to say it’s an enhancement and that people’s pictures should look like that, as you are. I wanted to make the pictures for different venues have a bit of a different style, that’s all.
You can recognise Ashton Court from the picture which is the purpose of it. I’m not trying to say this is how pictures should look.
I think if you’d added drama to the sky in a car photograph (for example), you’d have a better argument that the more contrast and drama the better. As it is you’ve just taken an indifferent snapshot and made it dramatic, giving you a dramatic indifferent snapshot.
.-= photomadesimpleВґs last blog ..Golf Widow Photography =-.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Well, I have my reason, why I added drama

That’s every person’s taste.
And for me discussion is many times better than just a comment 
First of all, that picture was made in the morning after night storm and the sky was really drammatic. However, it was really cloudy and the sun was very bright, that’s why It didn’t come out drammatic from the beginning
Moreover, I like pictures with emotions on them.
And I don’t say all pictures should be the same
By the way, I’m really happy, that you didn’t like my article, otherwise we wouldn’t be discussing photography at the moment
In the nearest future I’m going to write an article about photo shooting and I really hope to read your opinion about it
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Exactly — no criticism intended!!! It’s all art, and one person’s opinion is only as valid as anothers. It’s a bit of a hang-up of ours that people think that they don’t have to make much effort with the original photo as all the skill can be applied later. I’m not sure what that is, but it’s not really photography.
.-= PhotomadesimpleВґs last blog ..ISO priority mode? =-.
Like or Dislike:
0
0